We partner with a small number of companies each year where our work materially changes the trajectory of the business — and where long-term alignment makes more sense than a purely transactional relationship.
Most consulting and services models are misaligned by default. The provider is paid for activity, not for durable outcomes, and has no stake in what happens after the engagement ends.
On the other side, founders are asked to take on significant cost and execution risk, often without knowing whether the work will meaningfully compound over time.
Our partnership model exists to correct that misalignment by tying part of our upside to the long-term success of the systems we build and the businesses we support.
We begin like any other engagement: by understanding the business, the systems already in place, and the constraints that matter — technical, financial, and organizational.
If there is a clear opportunity for durable impact and mutual alignment, we structure the engagement as a partnership instead of a pure services contract.
We analyze the current state of your growth, data, and operational systems and identify where structural changes can create long-term leverage.
We design and implement the systems — technical, analytical, or operational — that create that leverage.
If the work is foundational and long-term, we structure a partnership so that we remain aligned as the business scales.
Partnership engagements are structured as a combination of cash compensation and warrants or options in the business.
This ensures we are compensated for the work we do today while remaining aligned with the long-term outcomes of that work.
The cash portion covers our time, team, and execution costs. It is typically priced below a comparable purely transactional engagement because part of our upside is deferred into the warrant.
The warrant represents the right — but not the obligation — to purchase equity in the company in the future at a predetermined price. It allows us to participate in the upside if the systems we build contribute meaningfully to long-term value creation.
We treat partnership work as if we were building inside our own company.
We focus on structural improvements that compound over time rather than isolated optimizations.
We take responsibility for implementation quality, not just recommendations.
We remain engaged as the systems evolve, not just until a contract ends.
Partnerships require openness, trust, and a willingness to think beyond the next quarter.
Share data, constraints, and honest context so we can design systems that actually fit.
Support internal adoption and change management as systems are introduced.
Engage with the work as infrastructure, not as a one-off project.
If this model resonates and you believe there may be a fit, the next step is simply a conversation.